1970 Ford Falcon vs. 2005 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Ford Falcon (155 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 340 kg more than 1970 Ford Falcon.
Because 1970 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Ford Falcon (326 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (105 Nm). This means 1970 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Ford Falcon | 2005 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Falcon | Megane |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4093 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 133 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 326 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1700 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2750 mm |
