1970 Ford Falcon vs. 2006 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2006 Mazda MPV is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1970 Ford Falcon. (155 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 1970 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Ford Falcon weights approximately 550 kg more than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Because 1970 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Ford Falcon (326 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda MPV. (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1970 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Ford Falcon | 2006 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Falcon | MPV |
Year Released | 1970 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4093 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 326 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2850 mm |