1970 Ford Falcon vs. 2006 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Ford Falcon (217 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2006 Smart ForFour. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart ForFour.
Because 1970 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Ford Falcon (408 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Smart ForFour. (136 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1970 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Smart ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Ford Falcon | 2006 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Ford | Smart |
Model | Falcon | ForFour |
Year Released | 1970 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1123 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2510 mm |