1970 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (148 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1970 Ford Falcon. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1970 Ford Falcon.
Because 1970 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (320 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Ford Falcon. (259 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Ford Falcon | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Falcon | Cruze |
Year Released | 1970 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 259 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2685 mm |