1970 Ford Maverick vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Maverick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Maverick would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK (216 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1970 Ford Maverick. (81 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1970 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 5 kg more than 1970 Ford Maverick. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK (311 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Ford Maverick. (175 Nm). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Ford Maverick | 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Maverick | CLK |
Year Released | 1970 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 216 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 311 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1265 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2860 mm |