1970 Ford Maverick vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Maverick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Maverick would be higher. At 4,096 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1970 Ford Maverick. (97 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU should accelerate faster than 1970 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 600 kg more than 1970 Ford Maverick. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Ford Maverick. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Ford Maverick (248 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 1970 Ford Maverick will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Ford Maverick | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Maverick | SSU |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4096 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 248 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2570 mm |
