1970 Holden Monaro vs. 2000 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 4,139 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Sable weights approximately 214 kg more than 1970 Holden Monaro.
Because 1970 Holden Monaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Holden Monaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Holden Monaro (356 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercury Sable. (248 Nm). This means 1970 Holden Monaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Holden Monaro | 2000 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Holden | Mercury |
Model | Monaro | Sable |
Year Released | 1970 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4139 cc | 3001 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 356 Nm | 248 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1574 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2760 mm |