1970 Honda N III vs. 1965 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 1970 Honda N III is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Plymouth Valiant (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1970 Honda N III. (31 HP @ 8500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Plymouth Valiant should accelerate faster than 1970 Honda N III.
Because 1965 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Honda N III, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Honda N III | 1965 Plymouth Valiant | |
| Make | Honda | Plymouth |
| Model | N III | Valiant |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 354 cc | 2789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 31 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2700 mm |
