1970 Honda N III vs. 1996 Saturn SC

To start off, 1996 Saturn SC is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Honda N III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Honda N III would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Saturn SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Saturn SC (101 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1970 Honda N III. (36 HP @ 9000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Saturn SC should accelerate faster than 1970 Honda N III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Saturn SC weights approximately 505 kg more than 1970 Honda N III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Saturn SC (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Honda N III. (32 Nm @ 7000 RPM). This means 1996 Saturn SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Honda N III. 1996 Saturn SC has automatic transmission and 1970 Honda N III has manual transmission. 1970 Honda N III will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Saturn SC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: