1970 Honda Z vs. 1951 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1970 Honda Z is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Talbot Baby (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1970 Honda Z. (37 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 1970 Honda Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Talbot Baby weights approximately 1125 kg more than 1970 Honda Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Honda Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Honda Z | 1951 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Honda | Talbot |
Model | Z | Baby |
Year Released | 1970 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 525 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3130 mm |