1970 Isuzu Florian vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1970 Isuzu Florian is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1970 Isuzu Florian. (83 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1970 Isuzu Florian. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1970 Isuzu Florian. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Isuzu Florian. (123 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Isuzu Florian.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Isuzu Florian | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Triumph |
| Model | Florian | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1582 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2700 mm |
