1970 Isuzu New Bellel vs. 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Isuzu New Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Isuzu New Bellel would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass (150 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1970 Isuzu New Bellel. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1970 Isuzu New Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 109 kg more than 1970 Isuzu New Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass (249 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Isuzu New Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Isuzu New Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Isuzu New Bellel | 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Isuzu | Oldsmobile |
| Model | New Bellel | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3135 cc |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 150 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 249 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1404 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2720 mm |
