1970 Jaguar E-Type vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1983 Zastava 102 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Jaguar E-Type (246 HP) has 197 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Jaguar E-Type should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Jaguar E-Type weights approximately 550 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Jaguar E-Type (357 Nm) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm). This means 1970 Jaguar E-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Jaguar E-Type | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Zastava |
| Model | E-Type | 102 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 4200 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 246 HP | 49 HP |
| Torque | 357 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2160 mm |
