1970 Jaguar Type E vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1970 Jaguar Type E is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Jaguar Type E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Jaguar Type E (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (38 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Jaguar Type E should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Jaguar Type E weights approximately 626 kg more than 1968 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Jaguar Type E | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Jaguar | ZAZ |
| Model | Type E | 966 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2170 mm |
