1970 Jaguar Type E vs. 1996 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1996 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Jaguar Type E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Jaguar Type E would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Jaguar Type E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Jaguar Type E (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1996 Toyota 4Runner. (123 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Jaguar Type E should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 450 kg more than 1970 Jaguar Type E.
Because 1996 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Jaguar Type E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Jaguar Type E | 1996 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
| Model | Type E | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 2982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1850 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1700 mm |
