1970 Jaguar Type E vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Jaguar Type E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Jaguar Type E would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Jaguar Type E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Jaguar Type E (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (148 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Jaguar Type E should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Roadster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Jaguar Type E weights approximately 320 kg more than 2003 Mazda Roadster. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Jaguar Type E | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | Type E | Roadster |
Year Released | 1970 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1838 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2270 mm |