1970 Jaguar Type E vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Jaguar Type E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Jaguar Type E would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Jaguar Type E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Jaguar Type E (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (154 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Jaguar Type E should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1970 Jaguar Type E.
Because 1970 Jaguar Type E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Jaguar Type E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Jaguar Type E | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | Type E | 3 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 2260 cc |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2650 mm |