1970 Jaguar Type E vs. 2009 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2009 Toyota Highlander is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Jaguar Type E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Jaguar Type E would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Jaguar Type E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Highlander (270 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1970 Jaguar Type E. (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1970 Jaguar Type E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Jaguar Type E weights approximately 68 kg more than 2009 Toyota Highlander.
Because 1970 Jaguar Type E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Jaguar Type E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Highlander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Jaguar Type E | 2009 Toyota Highlander | |
| Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
| Model | Type E | Highlander |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 3456 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1332 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2800 mm |
