1970 Jaguar Type E vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Jaguar Type E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Jaguar Type E would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Jaguar Type E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Jaguar Type E (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 6. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Jaguar Type E should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 78 kg more than 1970 Jaguar Type E.
Because 1970 Jaguar Type E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Jaguar Type E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Jaguar Type E | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
| Model | Type E | 6 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1839 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2789 mm |
