1970 Jaguar Type E vs. 2010 Renault Duster
To start off, 2010 Renault Duster is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Jaguar Type E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Jaguar Type E would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Jaguar Type E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Jaguar Type E (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2010 Renault Duster. (104 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Jaguar Type E should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Duster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Jaguar Type E weights approximately 200 kg more than 2010 Renault Duster. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Jaguar Type E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Jaguar Type E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Duster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Jaguar Type E | 2010 Renault Duster | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | Type E | Duster |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4315 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1822 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2673 mm |
