1970 Jaguar Type E vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Jaguar Type E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Jaguar Type E would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Jaguar Type E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Equator (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1970 Jaguar Type E. (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1970 Jaguar Type E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Jaguar Type E weights approximately 105 kg more than 2010 Suzuki Equator.
Because 2010 Suzuki Equator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Jaguar Type E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Equator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Jaguar Type E | 2010 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
| Model | Type E | Equator |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 3953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3560 mm |
