1970 Jaguar Type E vs. 2010 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Toyota Tundra is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Jaguar Type E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Jaguar Type E would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Jaguar Type E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Tundra (233 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1970 Jaguar Type E. (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1970 Jaguar Type E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Jaguar Type E weights approximately 326 kg more than 2010 Toyota Tundra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Jaguar Type E | 2010 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | Type E | Tundra |
Year Released | 1970 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 233 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1074 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2610 mm |