1970 Jaguar Type E vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Jaguar Type E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Jaguar Type E would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Jaguar Type E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo C30 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1970 Jaguar Type E. (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1970 Jaguar Type E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 51 kg more than 1970 Jaguar Type E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Jaguar Type E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Jaguar Type E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Jaguar Type E | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
| Model | Type E | C30 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2639 mm |
