1970 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 197 more horse power than 1970 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1970 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1970 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Rover 75 (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Jeep CJ5 | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | CJ5 | 75 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 256 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2750 mm |