1970 Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs. 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1970 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 1970 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Jeep | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Grand Wagoneer | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1953 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3690 mm |
