1970 Lotus Elan vs. 1992 Mini MK VI
To start off, 1992 Mini MK VI is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,556 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Lotus Elan (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1992 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1992 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Lotus Elan weights approximately 80 kg more than 1992 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mini MK VI, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Lotus Elan | 1992 Mini MK VI | |
| Make | Lotus | Mini |
| Model | Elan | MK VI |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1556 cc | 998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 41 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1360 mm |
