1970 Matra-Simca M530 vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1970 Matra-Simca M530 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Talbot Baby (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1970 Matra-Simca M530. (71 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 1970 Matra-Simca M530. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Baby weights approximately 715 kg more than 1970 Matra-Simca M530. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Matra-Simca M530 | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Talbot |
| Model | M530 | Baby |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 1699 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3130 mm |
