1970 Matra-Simca M530 vs. 2011 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2011 Holden Cruze is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Matra-Simca M530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Matra-Simca M530 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Cruze (161 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1970 Matra-Simca M530. (71 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1970 Matra-Simca M530.
Because 1970 Matra-Simca M530 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Matra-Simca M530. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Cruze (360 Nm) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Matra-Simca M530. (128 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Matra-Simca M530.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Matra-Simca M530 | 2011 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Holden |
| Model | M530 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 1699 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2685 mm |
