1970 Matra-Simca M530 vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Matra-Simca M530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Matra-Simca M530 would be higher. At 1,699 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Matra-Simca M530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot RCZ (197 HP) has 126 more horse power than 1970 Matra-Simca M530. (71 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 1970 Matra-Simca M530.
Because 1970 Matra-Simca M530 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Matra-Simca M530. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Matra-Simca M530 | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Peugeot |
| Model | M530 | RCZ |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1699 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4287 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1359 mm |
