1970 Mazda 1000 vs. 2004 Toyota Camry

To start off, 2004 Toyota Camry is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Camry (157 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1970 Mazda 1000. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1970 Mazda 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Camry weights approximately 715 kg more than 1970 Mazda 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1970 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Camry (220 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda 1000. (77 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda 1000.

Compare all specifications: