1970 Mazda 616 vs. 1995 Renault Clio
To start off, 1995 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Mazda 616 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mazda 616 (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1995 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mazda 616 should accelerate faster than 1995 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Mazda 616 weights approximately 55 kg more than 1995 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mazda 616 (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Renault Clio. (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1970 Mazda 616 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Mazda 616 | 1995 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 616 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1171 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2680 mm |
