1970 Mazda 616 vs. 2004 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2004 Toyota MR2 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota MR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota MR2 (142 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1970 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1970 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota MR2 weights approximately 155 kg more than 1970 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota MR2 (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Toyota MR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Mazda 616 | 2004 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 616 | MR2 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 91.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2460 mm |