1970 Mazda 616 vs. 2010 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Toyota Tundra is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Tundra (276 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1970 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1970 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 170 kg more than 1970 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Tundra (424 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Mazda 616 | 2010 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 616 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1970 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 4664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 424 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3230 mm |