1970 Mazda 616 vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC60 (235 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1970 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1970 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 910 kg more than 1970 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo XC60 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Mazda 616 | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 616 | XC60 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2774 mm |