1970 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1963 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1970 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1970 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 60 kg more than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mazda Cosmo (134 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. (125 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1970 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Vitesse.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Mazda Cosmo | 1963 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | Cosmo | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1970 | 1963 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1596 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2270 mm |