1970 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1970 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1970 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda Cosmo. (134 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1965 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Mazda Cosmo | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | Cosmo | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1997 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2700 mm |
