1970 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2002 Seat Alhambra
To start off, 2002 Seat Alhambra is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1970 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Seat Alhambra (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1970 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Seat Alhambra should accelerate faster than 1970 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Seat Alhambra weights approximately 728 kg more than 1970 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Seat Alhambra (214 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda Cosmo. (134 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Seat Alhambra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Mazda Cosmo | 2002 Seat Alhambra | |
| Make | Mazda | Seat |
| Model | Cosmo | Alhambra |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1781 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 214 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1668 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2830 mm |
