1970 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2004 Seat Toledo
To start off, 2004 Seat Toledo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1970 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Seat Toledo (138 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1970 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Seat Toledo should accelerate faster than 1970 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Seat Toledo weights approximately 480 kg more than 1970 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Seat Toledo (310 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda Cosmo. (134 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Seat Toledo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Mazda Cosmo | 2004 Seat Toledo | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | Cosmo | Toledo |
Year Released | 1970 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1896 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2580 mm |