1970 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1982 Monteverdi Tiara
To start off, 1982 Monteverdi Tiara is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,837 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Monteverdi Tiara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Monteverdi Tiara (201 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1970 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Monteverdi Tiara should accelerate faster than 1970 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1970 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Monteverdi Tiara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Monteverdi Tiara has automatic transmission and 1970 Mazda RX-2 has manual transmission. 1970 Mazda RX-2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Monteverdi Tiara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Mazda RX-2 | 1982 Monteverdi Tiara | |
| Make | Mazda | Monteverdi |
| Model | RX-2 | Tiara |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 3837 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3080 mm |
