1970 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1982 Opel Manta
To start off, 1982 Opel Manta is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1970 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1982 Opel Manta. (110 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Manta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Opel Manta weights approximately 130 kg more than 1970 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Opel Manta (161 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Opel Manta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Mazda RX-2 | 1982 Opel Manta | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | RX-2 | Manta |
Year Released | 1970 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1979 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 161 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2600 mm |