1970 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1970 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (197 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1970 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1970 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1970 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Renault Clio (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Mazda RX-2 | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | RX-2 | Clio |
Year Released | 1970 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7250 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1770 mm |