1970 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2009 Holden Epica

To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1970 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1970 Mazda RX-2.

Because 1970 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda RX-2. 2009 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1970 Mazda RX-2 has manual transmission. 1970 Mazda RX-2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: