1970 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2010 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2010 Nissan Navara is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Navara is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Mazda RX-2 | 2010 Nissan Navara | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | RX-2 | Navara |
Year Released | 1970 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3210 mm |