1970 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2010 Peugeot 5008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 5008 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1970 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 5008. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 5008.
Because 1970 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 5008, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 5008 (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 5008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Mazda RX-2 | 2010 Peugeot 5008 | |
| Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
| Model | RX-2 | 5008 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1835 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2735 mm |
