1970 Mercedes-Benz 250 vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 250 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercedes-Benz 250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 250 (129 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 250 should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 250 (217 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1970 Mercedes-Benz 250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Mercedes-Benz 250 | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
Model | 250 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1970 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2778 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.5 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.8 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 64 L |