1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (180 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Because 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (258 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm). This means 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Riley |
| Model | 280 | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 2778 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2380 mm |
