1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 vs. 1987 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1987 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (180 HP) has 120 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (258 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | 1987 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | 280 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1970 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2778 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 102 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.6 mm | 75.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 70.1 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2440 mm |