1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 vs. 2006 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (180 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2006 Suzuki Reno. (126 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 2006 Suzuki Reno.
Because 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (258 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Suzuki Reno. (178 Nm). This means 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Suzuki Reno.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | 2006 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Suzuki |
Model | 280 | Reno |
Year Released | 1970 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2778 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 126 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 178 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.6 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2610 mm |