1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 vs. 2006 Volvo C70
To start off, 2006 Volvo C70 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (180 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2006 Volvo C70. (168 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo C70.
Because 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (258 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volvo C70. (230 Nm). This means 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | 2006 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | 280 | C70 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2778 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 168 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 230 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.6 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 190 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2650 mm |