1970 Mercury Comet vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1970 Mercury Comet. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1970 Mercury Comet.
Because 1970 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Mercury Comet | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mercury | Ford |
Model | Comet | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1970 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2782 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2490 mm |